Christianity and Freemasonry have had a mixed relationship, with various Christian denominations strongly discouraging or even prohibiting members from becoming Freemasons while others are supportive of Freemasonry and have friendly relations with local Masonic lodges.
Contents |
While Freemasonry is non-sectarian, some Masonic bodies and rites require a statement of Christian faith to join. These include (but are not limited to) the Knights Templar, the Rectified Scottish Rite, the Swedish Rite, Societas Rosicruciana, the Royal Order of Scotland and the Red Cross of Constantine. Additionally, there are numerous Masonic orders and degrees that while not specifically requiring a profession of faith, require that potential members belong to one or more of the bodies which do and as a result limit their membership to professing Christians (e.g. the Commemorative Order of St. Thomas of Acon, the Holy Royal Arch Knight Templar Priests, the Knight York Cross of Honor (KYCH), the York Rite College, etc.)
The Roman Catholic Church has been a persistent critic of Freemasonry. The Church has prohibited its members from being Freemasons since In Eminenti Apostolatus in 1738. Since 1738, the Vatican has issued several papal bulls banning membership of Catholics from Freemasonry under threat of excommunication. Currently, as reiterated in 1983, Catholics who enroll in Masonic Associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion;[1] the penalty of excommunication is not formally declared in the current code of canon law, but those who enroll in Masonic Associations (i.e. most College Greek Fraternities, Lion's Club, Kiwanis, the Rotary Club, etc.) commit a Grave Sin and therefore Masonic Catholics may not take the Sacrament (As any Catholic in a state of Grave Sin is asked not to take the Sacrament).[2] The prohibition is often faulted by Catholics who enroll in Masonic Associations, ultimately it is the sacrament of baptism that makes them part of the Universal or Catholic Church (Any Christian Baptism is perceived as making one Christian in the eyes of the Church.)
In the last decade American Catholics believed, erroneously, they were permitted to join Masonic Lodges, primarily due to an exchange of correspondence between Thomas Anslow, the Judicial Vicar of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles and David Patterson, Executive Secretary of the Masonic Service Bureau of Los Angeles. In a letter, written in 2000, which was publicly retracted in 2002, is a reply to the question "whether a practicing Catholic may join a Masonic Lodge" Father Anslow said that "at least for Catholics in the United States, I believe the answer is probably yes". This was publicly retracted when it was made clear that, by his own admission, "that [Anslow's] analysis was faulty" and the teaching of the Catholic Church had remained the same.[3] The Key point of Anslow's understanding of that argument is as follows:
The key point in the argument is that the system of symbols common to Freemasons around the world (centering on the Architect of the Universe and given added weight by the rule of secrecy) tends to foster a "supraconfessional humanitarian" way of conceiving the divine that neutralizes or replaces the faith dimension of our relationship with God. Even though given lodges may abstain from endorsing any particular position, including one that considers religious faith to be a matter of indifference (i.e., nothing more than a matter of personal preference), the contemporary world's social atmosphere of moral and religious relativism creates a climate in which a merely humanitarian symbol system works to undermine the religious faith by which we receive God's revelation." [4]
The Catholic Church argues that the philosophy of French Freemasonry (the Grand Orient, not the dominant variety of Freemasonry or the branch that is active in the English-speaking world) is antithetical to Christian doctrine and that it is at many times and places anti-clerical in intent.[5] The 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia argued that some of the ceremonial in the Scottish Rite is anti-Catholic.[6] However this claim does not appear in subsequent editions.[7]
The Masonic use of Biblical imagery was seen in the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia as being done in such a way as to deny the revelation of Christianity.[8] However this complaint was not included in subsequent editions.[7]
One of the persistent Catholic criticisms of Freemasonry is that it advocates a deist or naturalist view of creation. Freemasonry in fact requires of its members no specific view of a supreme being, as Deism would do, but rather a simple belief in a supreme being.
Whilst it is recognized that Masonry is not atheistic (Masons are asked if they believe in God before joining),[9] its use of the expression, "Supreme Architect of the Universe"--a term attributed to the Protestant theologian John Calvin--is seen by some Christian critics as indicating Deism, the belief that God created the Universe but did not intervene in the world after this.[10] This was a common heresy that arose in the Enlightenment.[11] But in fact, Masonry is emphatic about the pursuit of virtue, the moral standards that God expects men to live up to, and the rewards that await those who behave morally in this life.
A specific charge made in the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia[12] against Freemasonry is that the introduction of speculative Masonry in the early eighteenth century specifically aimed at "dechristianising" the old operative masonry lodges. However, this charge was dropped from subsequent editions.
Whereas the constitutions of previous lodges of operative Masonry stated that "The first charge is this that you be true to God and Holy Church and use no error or heresy"[13] in 1723 the constitution of the Grand Lodge of England:[14]
A Mason is obliged by his Tenure, to obey the moral law; and if he rightly understands the Art, he will never be a stupid Atheist nor an irreligious Libertine. But although in ancient Times Masons were charged in every Country to be of the Religion of that Country or Nation, whatever it was, yet 'tis now thought more expedient only to oblige them to that Religion in which all Men agree, leaving their particular Opinions to themselves; that is, to be good Men and true, or Men of Honour and Honesty, by whatever Denominations or Persuasions they may be distinguished; whereby Masonry becomes the Centre of Union, and the Means of conciliating true Friendship among Persons that must have remained at a perpetual Distance.
This change is construed by the Catholic Church as moving towards a Deistic view.[10]
American Freemasons are consistent advocates of the Freedom of Religion, as found in the First Amendment[15] of the US Constitution. The idea that the establishment clause means a strict separation of church and state is interpreted by the Catholic Church as a veiled attack on its place in public life.[16] Well into the Nineteenth Century, the Papacy continued to assert a divinely-ordained right to appoint civil rulers and depose them. It called opposition to this principle "Religious Indifferentism" by which no religion was acknowledged as true or revealed. And it rightly saw Freemasonry as a leader in the cause of popular sovereignty.[17] This reference is not present, however, in later versions of the encyclopedia. Some specific areas which Freemasons were accused of aiming for an improper separation of church and state were:
Catholic critics of Freemasonry correctly observe that it refuses to promote one faith as being superior to any others, while at the same time it also uses religious-type rituals. That combination is seen as inculcating an indifference to religion.[20][21] Freemasonic behaviour is seen as a denial of the truth of Christian revelation.[22]
The Masonic author Mackey called Freemasonry "a science which is engaged in the search after the divine truth".[23]
Anderson's Ancient Charges of a Freemason, 1723, says of Freemasons, that it is "expedient only to oblige them to that Religion in which all Men agree, leaving their particular Opinions to themselves".[14] Freemasons reply that not obliging a member to profess a certain religious viewpoint as a condition of membership is not the equivalent of asserting that no religion can be superior to any other. Personal theological beliefs are not to be discussed in the lodge, thus avoiding arguments with those holding different beliefs.[24] It has been suggested that this ban on religious discussion was especially important in Eighteenth Century England[25] where a civil war, in part caused by religious conflict, had only recently ended.
The great majority of Protestant denominations do not prohibit or discourage their members from joining Masonic lodges and have not issued any position papers condemning Freemasonry. Some churches have, however, formally opposed Masonry and spoken of the problems they see with Christians belonging to Masonic lodges.
In most instances, these are church bodies which broke from the mainline Protestant denominations in recent decades, citing as their reason their opposition to theological liberalism or diversity. The largest by far of the Lutheran, Presbyterian, and Methodist church bodies in the United States have not taken a stand against Freemasonry, and many Masons are active members of them. The largest of the Anglican churches in the United States, The Episcopal Church, has taken no stance against Masonry, nor have the various smaller Continuing Anglican and independent Anglican church bodies. Many Anglican clergymen in the USA are Masons.
There is a range of intensity among those Protestant denominations which discourage their congregants from joining Masonic lodges. Denominations that, in some form or other, discourage membership of Freemasons range from the tiny Evangelical Lutheran Synod[26] to larger Protestant church bodies. Among Protestants opposed to Freemasonry are the Church of the Nazarene, Mennonites, The North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention,[27][28] Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod,[29] Christian Reformed Church in North America,[30] Church of the Brethren,[31] Assemblies of God,[32] Society of Friends (Quakers),[33] United Brethren, Free Methodist church,[34] Seventh-day Adventist Church,[35] Orthodox Presbyterian Church,[36] Free Church of Scotland,[37] Baptist Union of Great Britain and Ireland,[38] Presbyterian Church in America,[39] Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland.[40] Most of these condemnations resulted from the work of church committees appointed only in recent decades which were composed of church members who, having no personal knowledge of Masonic ritual, relied for their determinations upon their interpretations of brief quotations attributed to Albert Pike or Manly P. Hall. It must be admitted, also, that many of these Protestant condemnations have never been enforced and are dead letters today.
The Church of Scotland does not ban congregants from becoming Freemasons, but in 1989 the general assembly said there were "very real theological difficulties" with Church of Scotland members being Freemasons.[41]
The 1985 Methodist Conference in England said that Freemasonry competed with Christian beliefs,[42] asking that Methodist Freemasons reconsider their membership and that Masonic meetings be banned from Methodist premises. It did not, however, call for a ban on membership, and some Masonic meetings have continued to take place on Methodist premises.[43]
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS church) has a longstanding policy of maintaining no official position on Freemasonry. However, some people see links between the two movements in practice, structure, and symbolism, which go back to the church's origins.
It can be said the early Latter Day Saint movement and Freemasonry had an amicable relationship. While the impact of Freemasonry in church doctrine is the subject of intense debate, it is known that the family of the church's founder and first president, Joseph Smith, Jr., was active in Freemasonry as early as 1816. When the church was headquartered in Nauvoo, Illinois, Smith and several of his followers – including his first four successors as church president – became Freemasons. Many features of the church's temple endowment ceremony as established by Smith in Nauvoo parallel rituals and ceremonies practiced in Freemasonry. When the church relocated to Utah in the 1840s after Smith's death, there was even talk of forming a "Mormon Grand Lodge." However, this notion was ultimately rejected by church President Brigham Young.
However, many non-Mormon Freemasons harbored strong anti-Mormon sentiments. Soon after Smith and his followers were initiated, the Grand Lodge of Illinois was compelled to revoke the charters of several predominantly Mormon Lodges. In 1872 the Grand Lodge of Utah was formed as an openly anti-Mormon organization. Over time the hostility increased, ultimately leading to the Grand Lodge of Utah banning Mormons from joining its constituent Lodges altogether. While the church never banned Freemasons from its ranks, it did at one time prohibit Freemasons from holding leadership positions in the church priesthood.
In 1984 the Grand Lodge of Utah and church leadership under President Spencer W. Kimball mutually agreed to drop their antagonistic positions against each another. While some suspicion remains on both sides, today there is no formal barrier preventing a male Mormon from becoming a Freemason or vice versa.[44][45]
Freemasonry unambiguously states that it is not a religion, nor a substitute for religion.[46] There is no separate "Masonic" God.[47] Nor is there a separate proper name for a deity in any branch of Freemasonry.[48] There is no general interpretation for any of the symbols. In keeping with the geometrical and architectural theme of Freemasonry, the Supreme Being is referred to in Masonic ritual by the attributes of Great Architect of the Universe (sometimes abbreviated as G.A.O.T.U.), Grand Geometer or something similar. Freemasons use these varied forms of address to make clear that the reference is generic, not about any one religion's particular identification of God.
Nevertheless, the same Freemasonry that is criticised as Deistic is also criticised for allegedly being a substitute for Christian belief. For example, the New Catholic Encyclopedia states the opinion that "Freemasonry displays all the elements of religion, and as such it becomes a rival to the religion of the Gospel. It includes temples and altars, prayers, a moral code, worship, vestments, feast days, the promise of reward or punishment in the afterlife, a hierarchy, and initiation and burial rites."[49] None of those features of historic Christianity is also characteristic of Deism.
Certain types of Freemasonry, most notably the Swedish Rite are said to be connected to Esoteric Christianity,[50] which holds that orthodox Christian doctrine is for the duller masses and that "real" Christianity holds the secret knowledge concerning the sacrifice of Christ on Golgotha.[51]
The Catholic Encyclopedia says that the Masonic authors Clavel, Ragnon, Pike and Mackey claim Masonic symbolism is rooted in the solar and phallic worship of pre-Christian mystery religion, particularly Egyptian religion.[52]
Some scholars believe that Freemasonry has links to the Rosicrucian movement. The Rosicrucian symbol of the Rose Cross is also found in certain rituals of appendant bodies to Freemasonry which require candidates to be Master Masons.[53]
Many Anti-Masonic Christian authors have stated that Rosicrucian Robert Fludd (1574–1637) was a Mason. However there is no evidence supporting this contention. Nor is there any documented evidence to support Arthur Edward Waite's (1857–1942) speculation that Fludd may have introduced a Rosicrucian influence into Freemasonry. Robert Vanloo states that earlier 17th century Rosicrucianism had a considerable influence on "Anglo-Saxon" Masonry.
A list of groups linked to both Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism, which requires for membership admission to be Christian and Master Mason (see websites), includes:
Manly Palmer Hall, a noted occultist and author on Masonic topics, wrote a book called Rosicrucian and Masonic Origins in 1929 (long before he ever became a Mason)[54] and the Rosicrucian author Max Heindel wrote a book in the 1910s,[55] both of which portray Catholicism and Freemasonry as being two distinct streams in the development of Christianity.
Some Christian critics of Freemasonry, often evangelical Christians, claim that Freemasonry involves the worship of Satan.[56] Such claims are often supported by quoting, misquoting, or quoting out of context various individuals, both Masonic and non-Masonic, but not Masonic ritual itself.
Below are some of the more common quotations used on the internet in the attempt to establish the claim that Masons worship Satan, with some notes about them:
First Conjuration Addressed to Emperor Lucifer. Emperor Lucifer, Master and Prince of Rebellious Spirits, I adjure thee to leave thine abode, in what-ever quarter of the world it may be situated and come hither to communicate with me. I command and I conjure thee in the Name of the Mighty Living God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, to appear without noise and without ....[57]
This quote is often attributed to "Arthur Edward Waite, 33°" on Christian Anti-Masonic websites, as if it were an authoritative statement from a "high level" Mason, but Waite is not identified as a 33rd degree Mason anywhere in the book the quote is taken from.[58] He is described simply as an individual with an interest in the occult. Waite was not a Mason when he wrote this book (the book was written and published in 1898; Waite became a Mason in 1902). Additionally, according to the Masonic research document "The Lie of Luciferianism"[59] Waite was never a 33rd degree Mason; he never joined the Scottish Rite. He was, however, a "high level" member of the Order of the Golden Dawn, a pseudo-Masonic organization that used Freemasonry as a model. Further, the book is discussing Black Magic, not Freemasonry. There is no link whatsoever between this material and Freemasonry, other than that a future Mason wrote it.
I hereby promise the Great Spirit Lucifer, Prince of Demons, that each year I will bring unto him a human soul to do with as it may please him, and in return Lucifer promises to bestow upon me the treasures of the earth and fulfil my every desire for the length of my natural life. If I fail to bring him each year the offering specified above, then my own soul shall be forfeit to him. Signed..... {Invocant signs pact with his own blood}[60]
This passage is from Manly Palmer Hall's The Secret Teachings of All Ages (specifically, the chapter "Ceremonial Magic and Sorcery."). As with Waite, Christian Anti-masons use this quotation as if it were an "authoritive" statement from a "high level" Mason. However, as with Waite, Hall is not identified as a 33° Mason anywhere in the book, nor is there a record of his reception of the 33° cited in any readily available source that does not include the above quotation. According to the Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon, Hall was initiated into Freemasonry, but not until 1954,[61] when he was 53 years old. The secret Teachings of All Ages was published in 1928,[62] when he was only 27. More importantly, the quotation is taken out of context. Hall is not discussing Freemasonry at all, but rather summarizing how a magician would invoke a spirit and giving an example of how a demonic pact might read. Hall was an occultist, and according to one source,[63] was a well-established lecturer on the occult and other esoterica by the age of 20, before he was even eligible to become a Mason.
When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy.[64]
This quotation appears in Hall's The Lost Keys Of Freemasonry. It appears in Chapter 4 (titled "The Fellowcraft") which has nothing to do with the actual Fellowcraft degree.[65] The passage is again taken out of context, and its meaning changes when it is put back into the context of the chapter it comes from: it is part of a larger philosophical discussion which can also be read to imply that the improper use of "energies" can make the Mason a tool of Satan. Furthermore, even taken out of context, this passage does not refer to worshipping Satan per se. As with the previous quotation from Secret Teachings of All Ages, the book was written well before Hall became a Mason. In his Introduction to the book Hall clearly states: "At the time I wrote this slender volume, I had just passed my twenty-first birthday, and my only contact with Freemasonry was through a few books commonly available to the public".[59]
Lucifer represents..Life..Thought..Progress..Civilization.. Liberty..Independence..Lucifer is the Logos..the Serpent, the Savior.[66]
This quotation is taken from Helena Petrovna Blavatsky's pseudo-masonic Ancient and Accepted Primitive Rite. Her Rite is not considered a legitimate part of Freemasonry by any Masonic Jurisdiction. Those who cite this quotation are conflating things Masonic and things that simply claim to be Masonic, or that used Freemasonry as a model.[59]
Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two Gods: darkness being necessary to light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive.[67]
Albert Pike is frequently quoted by Christian Anti-Masons, often with the quotation taken out of context. However, in this case the statement was not even written by Pike. It was included in a letter which con artist Leo Taxil claimed was from Pike, and was later demonstrated to be a forgery. See: Taxil hoax.
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed (1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. Robert Appleton Company.